From the SSM software or the format utility I get the disks names (SCSI nodes 1 to 3, scsi bus 2 - onle array disk):
- c2t1d0
- c2t2d0
- c2t3d0
Create a ZFS RAIDZ array is easy, just type:
# zpool create fsshared raidz c2t1d0 c2t2d0 c2t3d0Now I have a new folder named /fsshared:
# lsAt the list you can see the main boot zfs systems named as root and my new fsshared array. Now it's time to check speed.
bin dev export kernel mnt platform sbin usr
boot devices fsshared lib net proc system var
cdrom etc home lom2 opt rpool tmp vol
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
fsshared 89,9K 33,1G 28,0K /fsshared
rpool 4,67G 28,6G 97K /rpool
rpool/ROOT 3,67G 28,6G 21K legacy
rpool/ROOT/s10s_u8wos_08a 3,67G 28,6G 3,67G /
rpool/dump 512M 28,6G 512M -
rpool/export 44K 28,6G 23K /export
rpool/export/home 21K 28,6G 21K /export/home
rpool/swap 512M 28,8G 230M -
Create a new 2 GB file and watch how the array free space decreases:
# cd /fssharedTo check the write speed I copied the testfile to / and measured the time manualy
# mkfile 2g testfile
# ls
testfile
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
fsshared 2,00G 31,1G 2,00G /fsshared
rpool 4,74G 28,5G 97K /rpool
rpool/ROOT 3,74G 28,5G 21K legacy
rpool/ROOT/s10s_u8wos_08a 3,74G 28,5G 3,74G /
rpool/dump 512M 28,5G 512M -
rpool/export 44K 28,5G 23K /export
rpool/export/home 21K 28,5G 21K /export/home
rpool/swap 512M 28,8G 230M -
# cp /fsshared/testfile /This is not a good result and I'm start to think that the small amount of RAM in the server is one of the causes (with the slow CPU of course). Writing from the main disk to the array is slower than the reverse option. This speed is not fantastic but it's a write speed, now I need a gigabit card to check read speed. If read performance is ok, the V120 will be enough as NAS.
2048 MB - 161s - 12.8 MB/s
# rm /fsshared/testfile
# cp /testfile /fsshared
2048 MB - 181 s - 11.3 MB/s
A new test copying the same file from the array to the disk 2 of the server:
# zpool create disc2 c1t1d0Not better results here... And from the main disk to the second one of the server? And reverse?
# cp /fsshared/testfile /disc2
2048 MB - 164 s - 12,5 MB/s
# rm /disc2/testfile
# cp /testfile /disc2
2048 MB - 121s - 16.9 MB/s
Wow... Maybe the ZFS RAID calculations are too heavy for this server.
Ok. Next must be test NFS, FTP and SMB trasfer results.
1 comment:
Pretty great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wished to
mention that I've really loved surfing around your weblog posts. In any case I will be subscribing for your rss feed and I hope you write once more very soon!
my site > Tremec T56
Post a Comment